|
An overview of present salvage handling system being followed by
Insurers in Indian General Insurance Industry
1. Occurrence of Loss;
2. Adjuster appointed and she visits the site of loss where she apart
from doing various activities related to loss verification and loss
assessment, also handles salvage by salvage identification,
segregation, inventorize the goods and so on.
3. Adjuster requests the Insured to retain the salvage till further
instruction and protect the salvage.
4. Salvage Assessed by the Adjusters based on their experience and, if
required, quotations called from open market by the Adjuster and/or
Insurers.
5. Salvage is assessed based on the highest quotation so received.
Tenders called and newspaper advertisement published in case of large
salvages.
6. In case insured offers more, Generally they are allowed to retain
the salvage, else disposed to the proposed buyer under Adjuster’s
supervision.
Shortcomings noted in the above salvage
handling system, which may be divided into three categories:
I. Shortcomings relating to Management of Salvage
II. Shortcomings relating to Valuation of Salvage
III. Shortcomings relating to Methodology of Salvage
Settlement/Disposal.
I. Shortcomings relating to Management of
Salvage:
Following five shortcomings may be noted in the present system of
managing salvage:
a.
Insensitivity of Insured towards salvage: The salvage remains in the
custody of the Insured and the responsibility to manage and maintain
it remains with the Insured who Generally tend to be insensitive
towards the salvage. When a proposed buyer inspects the salvage it is
not at all in presentable state and there itself the expected value of
salvage goes down. Almost all the insurance policies now-a-days are on
RIV basis. In such circumstances, Insured has got a tendency to expect
new for old and in the process tend to ignore salvage. Proper
management of salvage is Generally not a priority for the Insured.
b.
Possible Misappropriation of Salvage: Over a period of time, before
the claim gets settled, Insured sometimes tend to utilize or sell the
unaffected or less affected items out of the salvaged merchandise. In
such case, if later on Insured retains the salvage, Insurers end up
paying full value to the Insured in respect of such utilized items and
get a nominal amount reduced from the claim amount as salvage offer
from Insured. There is no system of re inventory of salvage where
Insured retains the same.
c.
As an Adjuster, it is not feasible to keep day-to-day supervision of
the salvage vis-à-vis inventory prepared by them.
d.
Delayed salvage settlement: Where the claim settlement takes long, the
salvage value normally deflates over a period of time. Now, since
salvage is normally disposed at last stages after loss ascertainment /
settlement, the quotes are considerably lower than its potential value
at the time of loss. It may be pointed here that loss is indemnified
as on date of loss but salvage value is considered at a point of time
much later than that in such cases.
Even if in some cases the salvage value inflates as compared to the
date of loss, the Insured may not agree to the same. In some cases,
the value of salvage inflated so much that the actual value of loss as
per rates as on date of loss appeared negligible. Insurers, in such
cases, have to face a lot of hurdles in convincing the Insured, if at
all.
e.
Deterioration in salvage value, if any, normally remains unaccounted.
II. Shortcomings relating to Valuation / Optimization of Salvage
realization:
Presently the onus of handling the salvage and disposing it lies
with the surveyors and loss adjusters. To comment on the present
system of salvage handling by loss adjusters relating to valuation
would become a lot easier with the help of following imaginary story:
One day, a Paper consignment and a Rubber consignment (both a
recent subject matter of their respective insurance claims) met at a
marketplace and had the following friendly conversation:
|
Rubber to Paper: |
Hey! How are you doing? |
|
Paper to Rubber: |
I am great, how about you? |
|
Rubber to Paper: |
I am not feeling that good! |
|
Paper to Rubber: |
Why baby? You look to me in quite a reasonable shape despite
facing fire damages recently. Look at me, I am old, out of my
shape after that flood incident, and yet I am so happy!
|
|
Paper to Rubber: |
You know, I was sold off by the Insurance Adjuster for a paltry
20% of my original value to a commission agent who shall now
find an end consumer for me or may be I could face further
trading. I was treated like an unwanted thing in everyone’s life
and they just wanted to get rid of me ASAP. I feel ashamed. This
buyer was the same old guy out of Adjuster’s books whom she
sells Paper, rubber, sugar, cotton, rice, wheat, candies, or may
be airplanes! |
|
Paper to Rubber: |
Oh My God! 20%?! for you? That’s pathetic. You know I was sold
off to an end consumer for a handsome 40% despite facing severe
water damages.
|
|
Paper to Rubber: |
40%?!! How come? |
|
Paper to Rubber: |
Thanks to my Insurers who handed me over to a professional
salvage manager who took care of me, marketed me, found an end
consumer for me and got me sold off within 10 days. She already
had around 100 potential buyers for me, in addition to locating
fresh buyers, whom she called up, generated interest,
competition, facilitated my several inspections and so on. She
sort of loved me you know, and took full interest in me, I must
say.
|
|
Paper to Rubber: |
Wow! I hope many more such professionals come to Indian General
Insurance Industry, who TAKE CARE! |
The above imaginary story, though light heartedly, points out a very
crucial shortcoming of salvage handling system in Indian General
Insurance Industry that is the lack of potential market creation by
Loss Adjusters and Insurers for disposing the salvage, due to various
limitations.
In our Indian General Insurance Industry, underwriters and adjusters
manage the salvage process, relying on a local market and the two or
three bidders in their area. There has been a limited opportunity to
build a broader market and limited expertise in the material involved.
However, given the size of the potential salvage market, a
concentrated effort to tap the same can create a tremendous
opportunity. The use of Internet-based salvage marketing technology
can be one of the ways to achieve that.
If the salvage is churned by its proper marketing, research and
advertisement through various channels like internet, word of mouth
marketing, and newspaper etc., loss can be mitigated by having got
realized the Optimum Realization Value of the salvage. In most of the
traditional salvage disposal efforts, available proposed buyers
usually are limited to two or three. Using the online and other
marketing techniques we can attract a dramatic increase in competition
on an international level and the resulting proceeds.
Today, so much time is being invested by Insurers and Adjusters in
word of mouth negotiations with no satisfaction of optimizing salvage
realization at the end of day. This is just like when one purchases
something from a shop that allows bargaining, she is never satisfied
with the bargain unlike in case of a fixed price shop. We need to
determine the price through law of economics and not through word of
mouth. Let the market competition and law of economics decide the
price, otherwise we would never know whether we have negotiated the
maximum value or not, irrespective of the extent to which we have
perspired for that.
Time that Insurers and Adjusters invest in negotiations may be
utilized in developing innovative methods of cost avoidance and
improving operations.
Following five shortcomings may specifically be noted in the present
system of salvage valuation / optimization:
a.
Insurers and the Adjusters rely on a limited market, limited
experience relating to the salvage merchandise in question, and a
few proposed buyers showing interest in the salvaged
merchandise resulting in total lack of competition.
b.
Not much education or interest is created for the buyer to generate
real interest. Most of the times, Adjusters send proposed buyers to
inspect salvage without properly informing them about nature and
extent of damages. Sometimes, the visit itself is unplanned and
unsolicited. Information provided beforehand to the proposed buyers in
the form of photographs, online catalogue, nature and extent of
damages with quantitative and qualitative inventory, can help buyers
take informed and quick decision. A salvage manager or her
representative, should, as far as possible, accompany proposed buyer
during inspection so as to provide proper guidance relating to salvage
identification, nature of damages etc. and coordination with the owner
of goods.
c.
Adjusters find limited time and have limited facilities to concentrate
on salvage management. They normally do not market and advertise the
salvage, tap the potential market, and hence do not optimize salvage
realization. Also, as an Adjuster they are expected to only opine
about the probable assessment of salvage and not actually optimize the
salvage realization. Another drawback is the lack of reporting
capabilities as regards salvage in majority of cases, which often
leaves the analysis of salvage to anecdotal verification instead of
thorough and quantifiable facts.
d.
Insured are the best buyers of the salvaged merchandise, always. But,
it needs competition and marketing to get their hidden margin
out.
e.
Insured mostly either reject the salvaged material or quote very less,
primarily because of two reasons:
-Mostly the insurance policies are on NRV basis and since, Insured get
new for old; they Generally do not show much concern about minimizing
the loss by offering reasonable salvage value.
-Since the salvage remains their property and lies in their custody,
they wait for the Adjuster to get a better quote and then accordingly
increase their quotation using the Adjuster’s quote.
III. Shortcomings relating to Salvage Settlement / Disposal:
The methodology being adopted by Insurers for settlement / disposal of
salvage needs alteration. It is to be understood that when a claim
arises, the property in salvage remains with the Insured until the
claim is paid. But since Insurers are the ones who are concerned with
the recovery out of salvage, they themselves or through Adjusters go
on to offer the said salvage to open markets without subrogation of
rights in their favor.
To cater to this problem, a salvage manager is advised to act only on
the behalf of Insured, Insurers being facilitators of salvage sale. An
agreement needs to be entered between the Insured and salvage manager
agreeing to all the terms and conditions of salvage sale. This way,
since the Insured also gets involved in salvage sale, there is minimal
resistance as regards salvage settlement and disposal.
Conclusion:
There is an urgent need to understand the various shortcomings in our
present system of handling salvage. We need to scrap the old
methodology and consider the need of the hour and adopt salvage
management religiously.
Salvage Management is a full time job. It cannot be a small part of so
many things that a loss adjuster is supposed to do. If at all we
expect an adjuster to spend so much time on salvage handling, then the
loss assessment activity itself may get hampered and we would lose in
that respect. Perhaps that is why an adjuster as per rule and custom,
is expected to just opine on the probable salvage realization based on
his General market inquiries and not actually perspire to get some
good results in that respect.
Salvage management needs to be made a regular part of the claims
activity. Just like we appoint an adjuster after a loss takes place,
similarly we need to call for salvage management immediately. We
should not rely on adjusters anymore for our salvage handling or
disposal needs, just like we would not rely on a dentist to cure head
ache!
|